The chemical structure of compounds is one of the basic characteristics which a scientist needs to know to further predict its properties and its interaction with other substances, light, and its probability as a potential drug candidate. In the second half of the last century, spectroscopic techniques have flourished so much that scientists and researchers are using them efficiently as a tool for structure determination of compounds. The most frequently used spectroscopic techniques for this purpose are UV/visible, Infrared (IR), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), and Mas Spectrometry (MS). Each technique furnishes different information about the structure of the compounds, which may be combined to get to the final structure. Let’s see how useful these techniques are.
ULTRAVIOLET/VISIBLE
SPECTROSCOPY
UV/visible spectroscopy deals with the
interaction of UV/vis electromagnetic radiation with molecules. These
radiations cause electronic excitations when absorbed by some moieties
(chromophores) within a molecule. The energy and wavelength of the light
absorbed depends upon the makeup of the chromophore, which we can see in the
form of a spectrum giving some information about the structure. The most
important information we get is about the presence or absence of conjugation
(alternate single and double bonds) in a molecule, which can be deduced by
looking at the λ-max (wavelength at max absorbance) value.
INFRA
RED SPECTROSCOPY
Sometimes known as the functional group
spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy deals with the identification of different
functional groups present in the molecule. It studies the molecular vibrations
and gives spectrum in terms of the absorption frequencies of various functional
groups, dependent upon the bond strength and the masses of the attached atoms.
The signals appearing at different positions in the spectrum gives an idea
about the presence or absence of a particular functional group.
NMR
SPECTROSCOPY
NMR deals with the magnetic properties of
the nuclei and their behavior under the influence of a strong magnetic field
and absorption of radio waves. The most commonly studies nuclei are 1H
and 13C having different chemical shift (d
in
ppm) ranges on an NMR scale. The scale that starts from zero (the most upfield
region) encompasses different types of these nuclei present in the molecule.
The chemical shift value depends upon the chemical environment of the nuclei
under study.
2D-NMR
experiments (homonuclear and heteronuclear) help in
correlating 1H with 1H and 13C.
MASS
SPECTROMETRY
This technique helps in determining the
mass and molecular formula of a compound. The signals obtained from the
fragmentation of the molecule gives an idea about different structural features
of a compound.
LET’S
SOLVE A STRUCTURE
A molecule with molecular formula C9H8O4
(mass = 180) is being analyzed.
Index of Hydrogen Deficiency (IHD): 6 (12 hydrogens less than the alkane
having 9 carbons).
Mass spectrum gives the highest m/z signal
at 180, which means this is the molecular ion peak. The signal at 163 is 17
mass units less than 180 (loss of an -OH), which might be an indication of the
presence of –COOH in the molecule.
The base peak at 120 is 60 a.m.u less than
the M+, which is the combined loss of 17 and 43 as discussed above.
Having identified two carbonyl groups (IHD-2), we may assume the presence of a
six membered aromatic ring, which will make the IHD 6. But this is just an assumption at this point.
IR spectrum
1H-NMR of the compound
shows and intense signal at 2.23 ppm with an integration of 3, which means a
methyl group next to a carbonyl group (The same information as in MS). A one
proton signal at 13.08 ppm is a clear indication of the presence of carboxylic
acid (already deduced from IR and MS). The four signals around 7-7.9 ppm are
the four aromatic hydrogens. Thus the aromatic ring is confirmed (assumed
earlier in MS).
Thus an aromatic ring (3 double bonds +
ring = 4) and two carbonyl (2) completed the IHD, earlier calculated from the
molecular formula.
13C-NMR spectrum are of different
types:
Broadband-shows
all types of carbons
DEPT
90-Only
CH carbons
DEPT
135-CH3
and CH positive signals, CH2 negative signals
DEPT 90 DEPT 135
Broadband spectrum shows a total of 9
carbons (info in mol. Formula confirmed). DEPT has shown five signals (1 CH3
+ 4 CH), so the rest of the four signals in BB are for quaternary carbons (with
no hydrogens attached). The signals at 38-40 ppm are the solvent (DMSO)
signals.
So all we have till now is
The number of carbons, hydrogens and
oxygens are OK, so we don’t need to add anything else. The only thing left is
the sites of attachment to the ring.
Now
let’s move on to the 2D-NMR experiments.
Heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence
(HMQC) spectrum tells us about the hydrogens attached to carbons. From 13C
spectra we can see that there are only five carbons which have hydrogens
attached to them, so we would expect HMQC to show only 5 correlations. And this
is what exactly the following spectrum shows.
The horizontal scale is the 1H-NMR
spectrum while 13C chemical shifts are given on the vertical scale.
The spots in the spectrum are the correlations, which can be connected to the 1H
and 13C scales by drawing vertical and horizontal lines passing
through the spot. Thus the carbon at 20.8 is connected to the hydrogens at 2.23
(methyl protons), meaning that the carbon of the methyl group resonates at 20.8
ppm. Similarly the aromatic hydrogens have one spot each right below the
signals, which could be correlated to corresponding carbons to the right.
Correlation
spectroscopy (COSY) is a homonuclear technique, correlating
hydrogens geminal or vicinal to another hydrogen. There is no CH2 so
all the correlations are assumed to be vicinal. Here we have the 1H
scale on both sides. The spectrum has a diagonal and cross peaks above and
below the diagonal. We can connect the diagonal to the cross peak to get the
correlation. For example the proton at 7.17 is vicinal to the proton at 7.62
ppm. Similarly the proton at 7.35 is vicinal to both protons at 7.62 and 7.92.
7.62 is correlated to 7.35 and 7.17, while 7.92 is correlated to 7.35.
This suggests that the aromatic ring is
disubstituted and the substituent attached ortho to each other. But we don’t
know which substituent to attach at what position. For that we need to study
HMBC.
COSY correlations
can also be confirmed from the coupling constant data in 1H-NMR
spectrum.
Hydrogens attached
to adjacent carbons will have the same coupling constant.
What
we have now is
Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Connectivity (HMBC) gives long range couplings of 1H with 13C (usually 3 or 4 bonds away).
2.23 (CH3) à 169.2(quaternary). So this C is the carbonyl carbon of ester

2.23 also shows a weak correlation with carbon at 150 (q carbon of the ring). This means the ester group is attached by oxygen to the ring. The position is yet not clear (we have two points of attachments).
7.92 (CH) à 165.6 (carbonyl
of -COOH). Thus we may safely say that the –COOH group is attached next to the
carbon at 131.4, while the ester to the carbon next to it.
The structure can be counter checked by
examining all the HMBC correlations present in the spectrum.
UV spectrum gives two high absorbance
regions at 230 and 275, which are characteristics of aromatic rings.
UV spectrum
So the structure elucidated is given
below. The compound is Acetyl salicylic acid, commonly known as Aspirin.
No comments:
Post a Comment