Introduction
of technology in the earlier part of the new century, made life even more
simple for the on-field umpires. Hawk-eye, a highly complex computer program,
was introduced by Dr. Paul Hawkins in UK. This technology is based on the
surveillance of the game by six or seven high resolution video cameras,
installed in different areas of the playing field. The technology has been
accepted and being used in several sports such as cricket, tennis, badminton,
and snooker etc. The cameras watch the movement of the ball from different
angles, the data is collected and processed by a computer, which generates an
imaginary field of play in 3D, showing the movement of the ball and can
somewhat predict the path followed by the ball. Hawk-eye is accurate to within
5 mm.
CRICKET
The
game of cricket is being officiated by two on-field umpires and a third umpire
(TV umpire). The decisions made by on-field umpires can be challenged which are
then referred to the third umpire, and in some cases when the on-field umpire
is not sure, he refers the case to the TV umpire, who watches the game in slow
motion and gives decision. Hawk-eye was first used in a test match between
England and Pakistan. The major use of Hawk-eye in cricket is in judging the
batsman out or not out when the ball strikes his leg in front of the wickets
[Leg before wicket (LBW)]. The third umpire now makes use of this technology to
see whether the ball has struck the batsman in line of the stumps, part of the
leg where the ball hits him and project the movement of the ball toward the
stumps to see whether it would have hit the stumps or not. After official
recognition by International Cricket Council (ICC) in 2008, the technology is
being used in major ICC events. Still there are doubts about the accuracy of
the technology. A very controversial decision came during the world cup
semi-final match between India and Pakistan in 2011, when the Pakistani
off-spinner Saeed Ajmal had Sachin Tendulkar out LBW but was not given after
referral to the Hawk-eye. Critics say that the point where the ball hit the
batsman had moved a bit when the trajectory of the ball was being projected,
which showed that the ball was missing the stumps, Tendulkar survived and India
later won the match after his heroics. Three years later, a Pakistani batsman,
Shan Masood was controversially given out by using Hawk-eye technology (Pak vs
NZ), later admitted by the ICC that the decision was erroneous. The Indian
cricket board (BCCI) has never been in favor of using the technology, it being
not 100% accurate. Some other cricket experts and umpires have also shown
grievances over the use of technology in cricket, as it would reduce the impact
made by the on-field umpires on the game. Moreover, Hawk-eye provides a
complete profile of the player during and after the game, more of an interest
to the coaching staff and the opponent team, which they use for their
preparations for future games.
Tennis
The
game of tennis is monitored by 10 cameras. These cameras send images to the
computer which after processing the pixels related to the ball, creates a 3D
picture and tracks the path of the ball. It is useful for shots which land very
close to the court lines, making it difficult for the referee to judge whether it’s
“in” or “out”. The technology took effect in 2006, but again it has led to some
erroneous decisions at different occasions.
Badminton
The
use of the Hawk-eye technology in Badminton is very much similar to that of
tennis.
Snooker
In
snooker, Hawk-eye is used more as a tool for the viewers than for the
assistance of the referees. Its use in snooker is declining and is only used in
world championships.
Soccer
Hawk-eye
has been implemented in several football tournaments and the goal line
technology was used for the first time in 2014 FIFA world cup.
Major
criticism on the use of this technology in sports is because of its high cost,
loss of human element, and its less than 100% accuracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment